At the start of any shoot I always have a little bit of trepidation about how it will go. Will we get what we need? Have a picked the right kit? Have I thought of everything for the region or terrain we’re shooting in? But rarely have I started a shoot without knowing if what we’re setting out to do is even possible.
The show was commissioned by a major international documentary network and was one of their first 3D shows. Like me they considered most of the 3D programming made over the last few years to be little more than 3D wallpaper. They wanted to do something riskier, grittier and new. As far as I'm aware only huge budget feature productions had previously tried productions like this in 3D. We were going to attempt it on a ‘normal’ broadcast doco budget - a great risk for the producers and broadcaster.
The limited nature of recent 3D factual programming can be attributed to the complicated technical process and the fact that it’s so new no one really knows what’s possible or how to do it. The technology is big, slow and expensive. Broadcasters and producers have rightly been playing it safe as they get to grips with the format.
3D technology and knowledge is now progressing so fast that things change every month. The best route to take at the start of job might no longer be the best route at the end of job. New technology is being released almost monthly and the learning curve for crew, producers and broadcasters is so steep that the knowledge gained from just one job can be a radical step forward.
And so after proclaiming at the end of my last 3D job, “Don’t even think about observational film making in 3D” I found myself at the start of this project being briefed, “We’re going to try as much hand-held as possible and make an observational doc.”
I came to the project after stereographer Karl Schodt had already made the decision to use the Genus Hurricane 3D rig. Probably the single most important, door-opening decision of the whole shoot. We were also going to use Canon AF-305 cameras.

We shot tests both for technical stuff and aesthetics and it also give me chance to practice with the rig on my shoulder. I managed about 5 minutes before I was drenched in sweat and couldn’t hold it any longer. I think the whole thing was around 20kg but it was entirely front heavy. There was no way to get any weight on the back to counter balance it, in any case there’s a fine line between counter balance and simply too much weight.
My first solution was to run straps from the back of the rig down my back to a waist belt to take some of weight down my back. This worked a little bit but I found them the most helpful for actually keeping the rig on my shoulder rather than taking load. I could lean and tilt forwards safe in the knowledge that rig wouldn't fall forwards.


All this meant that I was very much the bionic man when built into the rig. It wasn’t easy to get in and out of so once I was locked in I would stay in it for as long as I could hold it for. These stints got longer as the shoot went on. The camera assistant Singha could also take some of the weight of the rig between takes whilst it stayed on my shoulder. Karl would get the runner to pass me bottle of water after bottle of water to rehydrate. It was extremely physical work especially in the Thai heat.

We also had an amazing gaffer and two sparks on the days when we had big setups.
After a few days getting to grips with the kit and work flow we really got it down. I would set the focus and exposure on the top camera and call my settings to Singha who would set the bottom camera. Simultaneously Karl would measure, set and check the 3D. We got it down so we could roll very quickly if needed. Amazing really compared to previous 3D shoots I'd been on.


For example, if the lens inter-axial had been set for a 1.5 meter subject, that meant I couldn’t go nearer to anything than 1.5 meters. In a developing set-up, where perhaps I would be following someone between rooms, in order to keep the shot usable I would constantly have to maintain frames which had similar properties to the existing 3D settings. If someone was about to step into the foreground of the shot I would have to preempt it and take a step back to keep the shot useable. If there were foreground or edgy objects I would have to be constantly aware of them and chose my position and frame accordingly.

The Canon AF-305’s held alignment very well - much better than the EX3’s on my previous 3D job. The main down-side of them is that they’re not great in low light. This coupled with the light-loss of the rig’s mirror and the fact that I’d chosen to shoot everything at 1/50th shutter to hold the fast action slightly better caused us to need to light almost everything but the brightest exterior. I had the Gaffer’s work cut out when we needed the entire crowd of a stadium lighting just so it wasn’t a black hole on camera. We initially tried to use four 5K HMIs but we couldn’t get the light even enough and the direct light was blinding people trying to watch the fight. Instead we opted for twelve 4 bank Kinoflos rigged into the low ceiling. They weren’t enough to get a full exposure but did enough to pull the crowd up and give the background some detail.
Karl is a great ‘can-do’ stereographer. We both agreed that if 3D is going to be a success this time around it has to fit into the current conventions of television production. It's no good forcing rules and regulations upon production to the point where the final production is dull - but in 3D. The only way 3D will survive is if captivating and exciting television can be made in 3D. That’s what we tried to do on this job - never say no.
The most challenging location was a training camp half way up a mountain in Chiang Rai province, northern Thailand. This was a back-to-basics hill camp with no electricity, basic accommodation and access via a 1km steep climb up a mud track and through a river.
There was no question we would need lights up there - and Litepanels weren’t going to cut it. Eventually we took a 1.2 HMI Par, 2X Kino Flo, a few battery powered Litepannels and, back breakingly, a 7kW generator. A village of porters had been booked to help us carry all this up the hill. But at 5am the next morning it was raining hard. Our vans drove through rivers and landslides slipping across the road. The porters, having more sense than us, only sent the village teenagers and stayed in the dry themselves. This meant two killer trips up and down the mud path for us and about four each for the kids. Three hours later we were soaking wet and covered in mud - each having fallen more than once. We were shattered and we hadn’t started shooting yet. It was totally worth it though as the location and characters up there were great and we shot some beautiful natural scenes the likes of which I’ve rarely seen in 3D before.

I haven’t seen a cut of it yet but I hear it’s going well without too many technical issues. I can’t wait to see it, but what's more it's the content I'm interested to see. The fact that we managed to get so much great actuality regardless of the number of dimensions is a real credit to the production team. That we managed it in 3D is the icing on the cake - and that's how 3D production should be seen. The medium is not the message.

